Which statement defines a non-bailable offense?

Which statement defines a non-bailable offense?

• A. An offense for which bail is readily granted.
• B. An offense that is not punishable by law.
• C. An offense for which the court would generally require the accused to remain in custody or for which bail is not readily granted.
• D. An offense that requires no appearance in court.

Answer: (C)

Non-bailable offenses are those where bail is not guaranteed and the court would ordinarily keep the accused in custody until the trial. The phrase captures that bail is not readily granted and detention is the typical outcome pending the case, reflecting the seriousness of the offense or concerns about flight, danger to witnesses, or public safety. This aligns with the idea that the court would generally require the accused to remain in custody or that bail isn’t easily granted. The other statements don’t fit: bail being readily granted describes bailable offenses; claiming the offense isn’t punishable by law isn’t describing an offense at all; and saying no appearance in court is required contradicts the fundamental need for the accused to appear in criminal proceedings.

Non-bailable offenses are those where bail is not guaranteed and the court would ordinarily keep the accused in custody until the trial. The phrase captures that bail is not readily granted and detention is the typical outcome pending the case, reflecting the seriousness of the offense or concerns about flight, danger to witnesses, or public safety.

This aligns with the idea that the court would generally require the accused to remain in custody or that bail isn’t easily granted. The other statements don’t fit: bail being readily granted describes bailable offenses; claiming the offense isn’t punishable by law isn’t describing an offense at all; and saying no appearance in court is required contradicts the fundamental need for the accused to appear in criminal proceedings.